The Other Softenings

Prakrit grammar and phonology
Beyond the great lenition — the smaller consonant shifts that give Prakrit its distinctive middle. Retroflexion, softening, and the sibilant merger.

Table of Contents

    Series

    Post 3 of 5 in A Beginner's Tour of Prakrit Sound Change — drawn from Hemacandra's Siddhahemaśabdānuśāsana, Adhyāya VIII, Pādas 1–2.

    In the previous post we met the two great changes: nine consonants dropping intervocalically, and five aspirates collapsing into h. Those two rules explain most of what looks unfamiliar about a Prakrit word. But between vowels a few other consonants also shift — not by dropping, but by becoming something else. This post rounds up those changes.

    The theme is the same: the middle of a Prakrit word wants to be softer, easier, more open. When a consonant cannot vanish, it will often melt a little.

    Examples in:

    A note on the trailing “a”. In Devanāgarī every consonant sign carries a built-in a — क is ka, so the cluster त्य is written tya and its Prakrit result च्च is written cca. In a change such as त्य → च्च (tya → cca) or ट → ड (ṭa → ḍa), only the consonants actually change; the a is there just so the letters can be pronounced.

    Retroflex softenings

    Sanskrit has a pair of retroflex stops, and , made by curling the tongue back to the roof of the mouth. Prakrit keeps them in initial position and in clusters, but between vowels it voices them.

    • (unaspirated retroflex softens to its voiced form)
    • ṭhḍh (aspirated retroflex softens the same way)
    SanskritPrakritMeaning
    नटnaṭaनडnaḍaactor
    भटbhaṭaभडbhaḍasoldier
    घटghaṭaघडghaḍapot
    मठmaṭhaमढmaḍhamonastery
    पठतिpaṭhatiपढइpaḍhaïreads
    कुठारkuṭhāraकुढारkuḍhāraaxe

    The rule is quiet but pervasive. Any Sanskrit word with an intervocalic or ṭh will show up in Prakrit with or ḍh.

    ḍ takes one further step

    And itself — the voiced retroflex — softens further, all the way to l.

    SanskritPrakritMeaning
    गरुडgaruḍaगरुलgarulaGaruḍa (the eagle)
    तडागtaḍāgaतलाअtalāapond
    क्रीडतिkrīḍatiकीलइkīlaïhe plays

    So the chain runs and l. A Sanskrit word with intervocalic often ends up with in Prakrit; a Sanskrit word with intervocalic often ends up with l. One important thing to keep in mind: once a rule has transformed a syllable, a second rule targeting that new syllable is not then applied to it. Each change is a resting point, not a stepping stone.

    Every n becomes ṇ

    This one is almost universal. Between vowels, Sanskrit dental n becomes retroflex .

    SanskritPrakritMeaning
    कनकkanakaकणयkaṇayagold
    वचनvacanaवयणvayaṇaspeech
    नयनnayanaणयणṇayaṇaeye
    मानयतिmānayatiमाणइmāṇaïhe honours

    Notice that in नयनnayana even the word-initial n is often written . Hemacandra makes this optional at the beginning of a word but obligatory in the middle. The result is that Prakrit texts are peppered with where Sanskrit had n, and this is one of the easiest visual cues that you are looking at Prakrit rather than Sanskrit.

    The sibilant merger

    Sanskrit has three sibilants: palatal ś, retroflex , and dental s. Prakrit merges all three into s.

    SanskritPrakritMeaning
    शब्दśabdaसद्दsaddaword
    कुशkuśaकुसkusaKuśa grass
    दशdaśaदसdasaten
    शुद्धśuddhaसुद्धsuddhapure
    षष्टिṣaṣṭiसट्ठिsaṭṭhisixty
    शेषśeṣaसेसsesaremainder

    One sibilant to rule them all. This means the same Prakrit s can trace back to any of three different Sanskrit sounds — so when you reconstruct backwards, you have to guess. सेसsesa could in principle come from a Sanskrit word with ś or with ; context tells you it is शेषśeṣa.

    b joins the softening club

    Just as intervocalic p becomes v (which we saw last time), intervocalic b also becomes v.

    SanskritPrakritMeaning
    अलाबुalābuअलावुalāvugourd
    शबलśabalaसवलsavaladappled

    This shift is less common than the p v one, simply because Sanskrit has fewer intervocalic b's to begin with. But when they appear, they too go the v way.

    What about m?

    Sanskrit m between vowels usually stays m — this consonant is stable. But in a small handful of specific words it gets nasalised: the m dissolves into a nasal quality on the surrounding vowel. So yamunā becomes ja:um̐ṇā (with a nasal echo on the ü), cāmuṇḍā becomes cāum̐ṇḍā. These are named exceptions rather than a general rule, and they are worth flagging only because they look strange when you first meet them.

    Putting it together

    The middle of a Prakrit word tends to be one of three things:

    • A vowel where a Sanskrit consonant used to be (the great lenition rule).
    • An h where a Sanskrit aspirate used to be.
    • A softer version of a Sanskrit consonant — for , l for , for n, s for ś or , v for p or b.

    Once you internalise those three tendencies, most single-consonant Prakrit words become readable. What remains is the trickier terrain of clusters — two or three consonants stacked together, which Prakrit finds uncomfortable and resolves in inventive ways. That is what the next posts are about.